Getting started description is outdated

[Mikhail42]

Expected behaviour

addSbtPlugin("com.github.sbt" % "sbt-native-packager" % "1.9.4")

Actual behaviour

addSbtPlugin("com.typesafe.sbt" % "sbt-native-packager" % "x.y.z")

Information

• https://www.scala-sbt.org/sbt-native-packager/gettingstarted.html

[raboof]

I just ran into this as well. It seems the documentation at https://www.scala-sbt.org/sbt-native-packager/ is outdated, but the documentation at https://sbt-native-packager.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ is up-to-date.

I don't quite understand where https://www.scala-sbt.org/sbt-native-packager/ is coming from, though: I don't see it referenced in https://github.com/sbt/website or https://github.com/sbt/sbt.github.com

[olaf-otto]

Same here, took me 20 minutes to find the groupid was changed - looks like at least gettingstarted.rst is not published to scala-sbt org as expected.

[raboof]

ok, so apparently it rolls up the pages from https://github.com/sbt/sbt-native-packager/tree/gh-pages - so I guess we should either replace that branch with redirects, delete it entirely, or make sure it's up-to-date. Any preference?

[SethTisue]

duplicate of #1504 , I think?

[Mikhail42]

replace that branch with redirects

ok, so apparently it rolls up the pages from https://github.com/sbt/sbt-native-packager/tree/gh-pages - so I guess we should either replace that branch with redirects, delete it entirely, or make sure it's up-to-date. Any preference?

Redirect to the correct page is fine. No need to duplicate info twice, but deleting entirely may be an option, I think google will return more correct pages after that.