Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Hey @nifadyev looks like a nice idea to try.
It shouldn't, I think it's still possible to maintain interactive notebooks as they are generated programmatically from the readme as well. Check: https://github.com/satwikkansal/wtfpython/tree/master/irrelevant The code'll need to be adjusted slightly, but it'll work. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hey @satwikkansal . Current contribution workflow contains a lot of duplication. For example, each translation duplicates code snippets and translates only comments. What do you think about using embedding code Github Action?
The goal is to store, test and analyze code snippets in one place, and reduce duplicity. Of course, it will probably brake current interactive notebooks or CLI, but it will bring more benefits than drawbacks. CI checks and validations, running snippets on various Python versions, automatic PR checks and so on
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions