Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use a RTICScope.toml instead of Cargo.toml metadata #92

Open
Tracked by #100
tmplt opened this issue Dec 15, 2021 · 0 comments
Open
Tracked by #100

Use a RTICScope.toml instead of Cargo.toml metadata #92

tmplt opened this issue Dec 15, 2021 · 0 comments
Milestone

Comments

@tmplt
Copy link
Member

tmplt commented Dec 15, 2021

A lot of required fields are now expected in cargo manifest metadata. I predict more will end up there. It may be a better idea to read these parameters from a RTICScope.toml file instead.

In either case we need to add a cargo rtic-scope init command that adds a skeleton file (or fields in Cargo.toml metadata).

An RTICScope.toml file will also draw more attention than a Cargo.toml when inspecting a crate.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant