Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug when the lock open or close and we do the same action via HA #28

Open
antonbek89 opened this issue Dec 7, 2022 · 6 comments
Open

Comments

@antonbek89
Copy link

If the lock already open and I tried open again via HA I got "operating" but actually nothing happens

And then I reload the integration again and now want to close and again - operating

It's become to useful again only If I close/open via Wehere APP and then everything back to normal

Bottom line
The bug when the lock already open/close and we do the same status via HA

@formatBCE formatBCE mentioned this issue Jan 24, 2023
@antonbek89
Copy link
Author

Did someone find any solution to the situation?

@formatBCE
Copy link
Contributor

Try to use code from my PR, and latest ESPHome gateway code. It eliminated similar problems for me - but for some locks it doesn't work.

@antonbek89
Copy link
Author

Try to use code from my PR, and latest ESPHome gateway code. It eliminated similar problems for me - but for some locks it doesn't work.

Where can I find it?

@formatBCE
Copy link
Contributor

@antonbek89
Copy link
Author

@formatBCE
Copy link
Contributor

I use same device.

Everything here is working with Airbnk.
PR is for Home Assistant integration (namely, you should replace code, that was changed in PR, in custom_device.py file).
Gateway code is for using with ESPHome. If you still use completely custom firmware (like, code, compiled in Platformio) - I highly recommend to switch to ESPHome.
You can find detailed instructions on that project's page.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants