Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support high fps sensor for rv1106/3 #319

Open
gehee opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Support high fps sensor for rv1106/3 #319

gehee opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@gehee
Copy link

gehee commented Feb 5, 2024

The rv1106/3 are great little SOCs but they are limited to low FPS sensors at the moment (unless I am missing something).
https://github.com/rockchip-linux/rkbin/blob/master/doc/release/RV1106_EN.md

Would it be possible to add support for sensors that can do 720@120fps or 1080p@120/90fps?
These modes should still fit within 2 MIPI lanes.
scpcom pushed a commit to scpcom/linux that referenced this issue Apr 28, 2024
@sm00th @gregkh
arm64: bpf: fix 32bit unconditional bswap
087dc50 
[ Upstream commit a51cd6b ]

In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the
generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words,
resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test:

[ 9757.262607] test_bpf: rockchip-linux#312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.264435] test_bpf: rockchip-linux#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times)
[ 9757.266260] test_bpf: rockchip-linux#314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.268000] test_bpf: rockchip-linux#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.269686] test_bpf: rockchip-linux#316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.271380] test_bpf: rockchip-linux#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times)
[ 9757.273022] test_bpf: rockchip-linux#318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS
[ 9757.274721] test_bpf: rockchip-linux#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS

Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32.

Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap")
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
scpcom pushed a commit to scpcom/linux that referenced this issue Nov 20, 2024
@hreinecke @gregkh
nvme: tcp: avoid race between queue_lock lock and destroy
4f94647 
[ Upstream commit 782373ba27660ba7d330208cf5509ece6feb4545 ]

Commit 76d54bf ("nvme-tcp: don't access released socket during
error recovery") added a mutex_lock() call for the queue->queue_lock
in nvme_tcp_get_address(). However, the mutex_lock() races with
mutex_destroy() in nvme_tcp_free_queue(), and causes the WARN below.

DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->magic != lock)
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 34077 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:587 __mutex_lock+0xcf0/0x1220
Modules linked in: nvmet_tcp nvmet nvme_tcp nvme_fabrics iw_cm ib_cm ib_core pktcdvd nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6 nft_reject nft_ct nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 ip_set nf_tables qrtr sunrpc ppdev 9pnet_virtio 9pnet pcspkr netfs parport_pc parport e1000 i2c_piix4 i2c_smbus loop fuse nfnetlink zram bochs drm_vram_helper drm_ttm_helper ttm drm_kms_helper xfs drm sym53c8xx floppy nvme scsi_transport_spi nvme_core nvme_auth serio_raw ata_generic pata_acpi dm_multipath qemu_fw_cfg [last unloaded: ib_uverbs]
CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 34077 Comm: udisksd Not tainted 6.11.0-rc7 rockchip-linux#319
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:__mutex_lock+0xcf0/0x1220
Code: 08 84 d2 0f 85 c8 04 00 00 8b 15 ef b6 c8 01 85 d2 0f 85 78 f4 ff ff 48 c7 c6 20 93 ee af 48 c7 c7 60 91 ee af e8 f0 a7 6d fd <0f> 0b e9 5e f4 ff ff 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 89 f2 48 c1
RSP: 0018:ffff88811305f760 EFLAGS: 00010286
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88812c652058 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000001
RBP: ffff88811305f8b0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed1075c36341
R10: ffff8883ae1b1a0b R11: 0000000000010498 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff88812c652058
FS:  00007f9713ae4980(0000) GS:ffff8883ae180000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007fcd78483c7c CR3: 0000000122c38000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 ? __warn.cold+0x5b/0x1af
 ? __mutex_lock+0xcf0/0x1220
 ? report_bug+0x1ec/0x390
 ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x80
 ? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x40
 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
 ? __mutex_lock+0xcf0/0x1220
 ? nvme_tcp_get_address+0xc2/0x1e0 [nvme_tcp]
 ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10
 ? __lock_acquire+0xd6a/0x59e0
 ? nvme_tcp_get_address+0xc2/0x1e0 [nvme_tcp]
 nvme_tcp_get_address+0xc2/0x1e0 [nvme_tcp]
 ? __pfx_nvme_tcp_get_address+0x10/0x10 [nvme_tcp]
 nvme_sysfs_show_address+0x81/0xc0 [nvme_core]
 dev_attr_show+0x42/0x80
 ? __asan_memset+0x1f/0x40
 sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x1f0/0x370
 seq_read_iter+0x2cb/0x1130
 ? rw_verify_area+0x3b1/0x590
 ? __mutex_lock+0x433/0x1220
 vfs_read+0x6a6/0xa20
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
 ? __pfx_vfs_read+0x10/0x10
 ksys_read+0xf7/0x1d0
 ? __pfx_ksys_read+0x10/0x10
 ? __x64_sys_openat+0x105/0x1d0
 do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
 ? __pfx_ksys_read+0x10/0x10
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
RIP: 0033:0x7f9713f55cfa
Code: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 20 48 89 55 e8 48 89 75 f0 89 7d f8 e8 e8 74 f8 ff 48 8b 55 e8 48 8b 75 f0 41 89 c0 8b 7d f8 31 c0 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 2e 44 89 c7 48 89 45 f8 e8 42 75 f8 ff 48 8b
RSP: 002b:00007ffd7f512e70 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055c38f316859 RCX: 00007f9713f55cfa
RDX: 0000000000000fff RSI: 00007ffd7f512eb0 RDI: 0000000000000011
RBP: 00007ffd7f512e90 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000ffffffff
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055c38f317148
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f96f4004f30 R15: 000055c3b6b623c0
 </TASK>

The WARN is observed when the blktests test case nvme/014 is repeated
with tcp transport. It is rare, and 200 times repeat is required to
recreate in some test environments.

To avoid the WARN, check the NVME_TCP_Q_LIVE flag before locking
queue->queue_lock. The flag is cleared long time before the lock gets
destroyed.

Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
scpcom pushed a commit to scpcom/linux that referenced this issue Nov 20, 2024
@hreinecke @gregkh
nvme: tcp: avoid race between queue_lock lock and destroy
975cb1d 
[ Upstream commit 782373ba27660ba7d330208cf5509ece6feb4545 ]

Commit 76d54bf ("nvme-tcp: don't access released socket during
error recovery") added a mutex_lock() call for the queue->queue_lock
in nvme_tcp_get_address(). However, the mutex_lock() races with
mutex_destroy() in nvme_tcp_free_queue(), and causes the WARN below.

DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->magic != lock)
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 34077 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:587 __mutex_lock+0xcf0/0x1220
Modules linked in: nvmet_tcp nvmet nvme_tcp nvme_fabrics iw_cm ib_cm ib_core pktcdvd nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6 nft_reject nft_ct nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 ip_set nf_tables qrtr sunrpc ppdev 9pnet_virtio 9pnet pcspkr netfs parport_pc parport e1000 i2c_piix4 i2c_smbus loop fuse nfnetlink zram bochs drm_vram_helper drm_ttm_helper ttm drm_kms_helper xfs drm sym53c8xx floppy nvme scsi_transport_spi nvme_core nvme_auth serio_raw ata_generic pata_acpi dm_multipath qemu_fw_cfg [last unloaded: ib_uverbs]
CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 34077 Comm: udisksd Not tainted 6.11.0-rc7 rockchip-linux#319
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:__mutex_lock+0xcf0/0x1220
Code: 08 84 d2 0f 85 c8 04 00 00 8b 15 ef b6 c8 01 85 d2 0f 85 78 f4 ff ff 48 c7 c6 20 93 ee af 48 c7 c7 60 91 ee af e8 f0 a7 6d fd <0f> 0b e9 5e f4 ff ff 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 89 f2 48 c1
RSP: 0018:ffff88811305f760 EFLAGS: 00010286
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88812c652058 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000001
RBP: ffff88811305f8b0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed1075c36341
R10: ffff8883ae1b1a0b R11: 0000000000010498 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff88812c652058
FS:  00007f9713ae4980(0000) GS:ffff8883ae180000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007fcd78483c7c CR3: 0000000122c38000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 ? __warn.cold+0x5b/0x1af
 ? __mutex_lock+0xcf0/0x1220
 ? report_bug+0x1ec/0x390
 ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x80
 ? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x40
 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
 ? __mutex_lock+0xcf0/0x1220
 ? nvme_tcp_get_address+0xc2/0x1e0 [nvme_tcp]
 ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10
 ? __lock_acquire+0xd6a/0x59e0
 ? nvme_tcp_get_address+0xc2/0x1e0 [nvme_tcp]
 nvme_tcp_get_address+0xc2/0x1e0 [nvme_tcp]
 ? __pfx_nvme_tcp_get_address+0x10/0x10 [nvme_tcp]
 nvme_sysfs_show_address+0x81/0xc0 [nvme_core]
 dev_attr_show+0x42/0x80
 ? __asan_memset+0x1f/0x40
 sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x1f0/0x370
 seq_read_iter+0x2cb/0x1130
 ? rw_verify_area+0x3b1/0x590
 ? __mutex_lock+0x433/0x1220
 vfs_read+0x6a6/0xa20
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
 ? __pfx_vfs_read+0x10/0x10
 ksys_read+0xf7/0x1d0
 ? __pfx_ksys_read+0x10/0x10
 ? __x64_sys_openat+0x105/0x1d0
 do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
 ? __pfx_ksys_read+0x10/0x10
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
RIP: 0033:0x7f9713f55cfa
Code: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 20 48 89 55 e8 48 89 75 f0 89 7d f8 e8 e8 74 f8 ff 48 8b 55 e8 48 8b 75 f0 41 89 c0 8b 7d f8 31 c0 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 2e 44 89 c7 48 89 45 f8 e8 42 75 f8 ff 48 8b
RSP: 002b:00007ffd7f512e70 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055c38f316859 RCX: 00007f9713f55cfa
RDX: 0000000000000fff RSI: 00007ffd7f512eb0 RDI: 0000000000000011
RBP: 00007ffd7f512e90 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000ffffffff
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055c38f317148
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f96f4004f30 R15: 000055c3b6b623c0
 </TASK>

The WARN is observed when the blktests test case nvme/014 is repeated
with tcp transport. It is rare, and 200 times repeat is required to
recreate in some test environments.

To avoid the WARN, check the NVME_TCP_Q_LIVE flag before locking
queue->queue_lock. The flag is cleared long time before the lock gets
destroyed.

Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@gehee