Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

calls and text messages synced under person instead of deal #54

Open
nellyr13 opened this issue Oct 21, 2020 · 5 comments
Open

calls and text messages synced under person instead of deal #54

nellyr13 opened this issue Oct 21, 2020 · 5 comments

Comments

@nellyr13
Copy link

It used to sync calls and texts under Deals in Pipedrive but I just noticed that everything is being saved under person. How do i sync calls and text messages under Deal again?

@zxdong262
Copy link
Contributor

@nellyr13 Currently it only sync to one deal, but we do not know which deal is one the user want to sync to, so we have to removed syncing to deal function.

@nellyr13
Copy link
Author

nellyr13 commented Oct 27, 2020 via email

@jdesperida
Copy link

Wondering the same thing, is there a way to link SMS to a deal? Thanks.

@zxdong262
Copy link
Contributor

@nellyr13 @jdesperida I have an idea now, I would add a switch in option so user can choose sync log to deal or not. Maybe next release.

@alexgoldsilver
Copy link

alexgoldsilver commented Jun 15, 2021

I would also love to see this addressed. Some ideas:

  • Can the link in the extension pass the deal_id to the extension for sync purposes when the call menu appears on the deal page? That way if you are on a deal page and click the call button, it is logged.
  • Also, can it be registered as a default call handler on the deal page, say via Javascript function on the "custom" call handler in the Caller settings of Pipedrive? If so, then you could just pass the activity_id and get even better matching.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants