You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently there are no checkboxes for the parent elements, if a node/category has a child element; only leaves have checkboxes.
For example,
in this case, I might know that a project used SURF infra but not aware which service was used. I still would like to check the box "SURF...".
This leads to another UX issue: for the trees that have branches with unequal depth, the missing checkboxes put different spacing, and even different font styles.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Another suggestion for UX improvements is to introduce +- to expand and contract some (sub)categories to make it easy to ready. Relevant to the issue #1341
Also, in some projects, we have detailed information about infrastructure like this one: https://research-software-directory.org/projects/exaflow But for some projects, we do not have this detailed information anymore, and need flexibility to be able to check higher level (sub)categories.
Currently there are no checkboxes for the parent elements, if a node/category has a child element; only leaves have checkboxes.
For example,
in this case, I might know that a project used SURF infra but not aware which service was used. I still would like to check the box "SURF...".
This leads to another UX issue: for the trees that have branches with unequal depth, the missing checkboxes put different spacing, and even different font styles.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: