Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 5, 2024. It is now read-only.

Rio installs Gloo even if explicitly disabled #1070

Open
golyalpha opened this issue Feb 19, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Rio installs Gloo even if explicitly disabled #1070

golyalpha opened this issue Feb 19, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@golyalpha
Copy link

Running rio install --disable-features gloo installs Gloo and provisions a LoadBalancer for the gateway regardless.

Services in the rio-system namespace:

> kubectl get service -n rio-system
NAME                TYPE           CLUSTER-IP       EXTERNAL-IP   PORT(S)                               AGE
gateway-proxy       LoadBalancer   10.245.184.248   <pending>     80:31309/TCP,443:30114/TCP            109s
gloo                ClusterIP      10.245.229.47    <none>        9977/TCP,9988/TCP,9966/TCP,9979/TCP   109s
rio-acme-solver     ClusterIP      10.245.179.105   <none>        8080/TCP                              2m4s
rio-api-validator   ClusterIP      10.245.98.204    <none>        443/TCP                               2m4s

Pods in the rio-system namespace:

> kubectl get pods -n rio-system
NAME                              READY   STATUS      RESTARTS   AGE
gateway-6c76f6b5bd-jtrct          1/1     Running     0          114s
gateway-proxy-7b87d8999f-w5q59    1/1     Running     0          85s
gloo-58cc697f4f-lfrfw             1/1     Running     0          114s
linkerd-install-h75t9-hrcwz       0/1     Completed   0          2m47s
rio-controller-7f5568889f-ctwtj   1/1     Running     1          3m1s

The rio-config configmap:

> kubectl describe configmap -n rio-system rio-config
Name:         rio-config
Namespace:    rio-system
Labels:       <none>
Annotations:  <none>

Data
====
config:
----
{
   "features":{
      "autoscaling":{
         "enabled":false,
         "description":"Auto-scaling services based on in-flight requests"
      },
      "build":{
         "enabled":false,
         "description":"Rio Build, from source code to deployment"
      },
      "dashboard":{
         "enabled":false,
         "description":"Rio UI"
      },
      "gloo":{
         "enabled":true,
         "description":"Run Gloo API gateway"
      },
      "ingress":{
         "enabled":false,
         "description":"Ingress as API gateway"
      },
      "istio":{
         "enabled":false,
         "description":"Istio service mesh"
      },
      "letsencrypt":{
         "enabled":true,
         "description":"Let's Encrypt"
      },
      "linkerd":{
         "enabled":true,
         "description":"linkerd service mesh"
      },
      "rdns":{
         "enabled":true,
         "description":"Acquire DNS from public Rancher DNS service"
      },
      "service":{
         "enabled":true,
         "description":"Rio Service Based UX - required"
      },
      "smi":{
         "enabled":true,
         "description":"Program SMI rules for services"
      }
   },
   "letsEncrypt":{
      
   },
   "rdnsUrl":"https://api.on-rio.io/v1",
   "gateway":{
      "serviceName":"gateway-proxy",
      "serviceNamespace":"rio-system"
   }
}
Events:  <none>

I should also note that running rio system feature --edit and disabling/enabling features before saving and exiting from the editor does nothing, and exits with 'No change to system config'

@golyalpha golyalpha added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 19, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant