Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Plone 5 #4

Open
mauritsvanrees opened this issue Aug 18, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

Support Plone 5 #4

mauritsvanrees opened this issue Aug 18, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@mauritsvanrees
Copy link
Contributor

I am having a look at what it would take to support Plone 5. I did a few changes in pull request #3 to ease this. Those changes are fine for earlier Plone versions as well.

I have some notes for Plone 5 here: https://github.com/zestsoftware/quintagroup.seoptimizer/blob/zest-plone5/PLONE5-TODO.txt
Summary:

  • Basic functionality already works without needing changes, except javascript. So that is good.
  • The controlpanel configlet is completely broken and Plone cannot even start without a few hacks.

I think the best way forward is to switch to using plone.app.registry instead of the portal_properties tool. Maybe we can then get rid of custom widgets code too.

Do you have any plans for porting to Plone 5?

What are your thoughts about compatibility? Is it fine if the master branch supports only Plone 5? 4.3 as well? More? Python 2.6 support still needed?
I have not tried making any add-ons compatible with Plone 5 yet. I guess supporting 4.3 plus 5.0 is reasonable for most add-ons. I am not sure if front-end changes are hard to keep working in 4 and 5 together.

@mauritsvanrees
Copy link
Contributor Author

Friendly ping. :-)

Do you have any plans for Plone 5 compatibility?
If anyone creates a pull request, is it fine if that would target Plone 5.0 only?

@mactrash
Copy link

Please support Plone 5 please.

@mauritsvanrees
Copy link
Contributor Author

Friendly ping.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants