Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider Prague (L4S-compliant) congestion control support #1498

Open
Ralith opened this issue Feb 25, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Consider Prague (L4S-compliant) congestion control support #1498

Ralith opened this issue Feb 25, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@Ralith
Copy link
Collaborator

Ralith commented Feb 25, 2023

draft-briscoe-iccrg-prague-congestion-control-02 proposes a new congestion controller that performs well on paths bottlenecked on ECN-capable links. I believe these are rare in most networks, but it might still be interesting to support. Another avenue to explore might be extending Cubic or BBR to satisfy L4S requirements.

@Ralith Ralith added enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Feb 25, 2023
@Abhicodes-crypto
Copy link

Hello @Ralith, I would like to help. Could you please provide me with more information.

@Ralith
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Ralith commented Apr 1, 2023

Thanks for the interest! The best place to start would be reading the linked internet draft. Feel free to reach out with any specific questions.

@Ralith Ralith changed the title Consider Pargue (L4S-compliant) congestion control support Consider Prague (L4S-compliant) congestion control support Aug 10, 2023
@jlivingood
Copy link

Of great interest. See also https://github.com/jlivingood/IETF-L4S-Deployment/blob/main/App-Developer-Guide.md and https://github.com/jlivingood/IETF-L4S-Deployment/blob/main/Network-Config-Guide.md for a sort of quick summary of the RFCs and the upcoming NQB docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants