Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace hyperopt #1232

Open
alecandido opened this issue Feb 28, 2024 · 5 comments · May be fixed by #1338
Open

Replace hyperopt #1232

alecandido opened this issue Feb 28, 2024 · 5 comments · May be fixed by #1338
Assignees

Comments

@alecandido
Copy link
Member

alecandido commented Feb 28, 2024

After #1231 (comment) I reviewed the state of hyperopt, and it's definitely unmaintained. The authors are not replying to the issues, and the contributions to the code are practically stuck.

If we care about the features supported by hyperopt, it should be replaced soon.

@alecandido
Copy link
Member Author

@MatteoRobbiati I'm not sure how this relates to qiboml. It is only used in DBI.

@andrea-pasquale
Copy link
Contributor

There were already some discussions about including hyperopt as a dependency or not...
I think it should be easy to eventually move to optuna which seems to be more maintained.

@MatteoRobbiati
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, moving to optuna is a good idea.

@MatteoRobbiati MatteoRobbiati self-assigned this Feb 28, 2024
@alecandido
Copy link
Member Author

Indeed, I was having a look as well, and optuna seems much more reliable!

@renatomello
Copy link
Contributor

renatomello commented Feb 29, 2024

Since this is related to DBI: some the DBI tests are very slow right now. Could this be improved as well?

@MatteoRobbiati MatteoRobbiati linked a pull request May 29, 2024 that will close this issue
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants