Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SWOT PIXCVec files with wrong Spatial Extents #227

Open
cordmaur opened this issue Jun 27, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

SWOT PIXCVec files with wrong Spatial Extents #227

cordmaur opened this issue Jun 27, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@cordmaur
Copy link

I'm using earthaccess to download PIXC and PIXCVec SWOT products.
For the same args (bbox and time range), the PIXCVec is returning several files that are not within the AOI.

Here is an example:

results = earthaccess.search_data(
    short_name='SWOT_L2_HR_PIXC_2.0', 
    temporal=('2023-11-06', '2023-11-07'), 
    bounding_box=AOI.bounds
)

Granules found: 1
results = earthaccess.search_data(
    short_name='SWOT_L2_HR_PIXCVec_2.0', 
    temporal=('2023-11-06', '2023-11-07'), 
    bounding_box=AOI.bounds
)

Granules found: 115

When we check for the results, we can see that several PIXVec files have Spatial Extent incorrectly (imho) set to -180, -90, 180, 90, and that's causing this discrepancy in the search.

image

I don't know if this is the best channel for such issue. I've also sent to the earthaccess github.

@cassienickles
Copy link
Member

Hi @cordmaur, for any future inquiries on SWOT data, feel free to post on this forum topic that is set up for questions like this one: https://forum.earthdata.nasa.gov/viewtopic.php?t=5270&_ga=2.8500789.1437785530.1719854366-1354658737.1715875596

@jjmcnelis any thoughts on this discrepancy in searching between PIXC and PIXCVec products and the spatial extent settings for the PIXCVec? Thanks!

@cordmaur
Copy link
Author

cordmaur commented Jul 3, 2024

Thank you @cassienickles , I posted the issue in the forum as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants