Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add support for ignoring specific folders under the assets directory #3076

Open
CNFeffery opened this issue Nov 15, 2024 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #3077
Open

add support for ignoring specific folders under the assets directory #3076

CNFeffery opened this issue Nov 15, 2024 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #3077
Labels
feature something new P3 backlog

Comments

@CNFeffery
Copy link
Contributor

The existing parameter assets_ignore can ignore files under the assets folder that match a specified regular expression pattern, but it cannot ignore specific folders under the assets folder as a whole, which would be useful in many scenarios.

@gvwilson gvwilson changed the title [Feature Request] Support for ignoring specific folders under the assets directory add support for ignoring specific folders under the assets directory Nov 15, 2024
@gvwilson gvwilson added feature something new P3 backlog labels Nov 15, 2024
@gvwilson
Copy link
Contributor

gvwilson commented Nov 15, 2024

thanks for the suggestion @CNFeffery - we're trying to get the Dash 3.0 release out the door right now, but I'll see if we can review #3077 soon after.

@BSd3v
Copy link
Contributor

BSd3v commented Nov 20, 2024

@CNFeffery ,

Have you used the static (flask default) folder to keep things from being uploaded to the server?

@CNFeffery
Copy link
Contributor Author

@BSd3v I hope the handling method in this scenario is as simple as possible, so I added a parameter that is convenient, fast, and easy to understand.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature something new P3 backlog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants