Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Documentation – table layout in 'List of resource types' is broken #688

Open
JdeBud opened this issue Aug 26, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Documentation – table layout in 'List of resource types' is broken #688

JdeBud opened this issue Aug 26, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
Bug

Comments

@JdeBud
Copy link

JdeBud commented Aug 26, 2022

In the PHP manual, the table is not in its place in the "Layout Content" section of the HTML. It seems to be a simple problem with the styling of the CSS.

Take a look on List of Resource Types.

image

<!DOCTYPE html>
<!--[…]-->
<div id="layout" class="clearfix">
    <section id="layout-content">
        <!--[…]-->
        <div id="resource" class="appendix">
            <!--[…]-->
            <table class="doctable table"> <!-- This is outside the frame -->
            <!--[…]-->
@cmb69
Copy link
Member

cmb69 commented Aug 26, 2022

Yeah, the overflowing tables are a known issue. Basically, this could be solved by applying overflow-x:scroll, but I'm not convinced that would be the right solution (consider mobile devices). Instead, I suggest to reconsider the use of tables; in this case, a structured list might be more appropriate (in which case that wouldn't be a web-php issue, but rather a doc-en issue, or possibly a phd issue).

@cmb69 cmb69 mentioned this issue Oct 13, 2022
Closed
@saundefined saundefined mentioned this issue Nov 17, 2022
Closed
@derickr derickr added the Bug label Nov 29, 2023
@cmb69 cmb69 mentioned this issue Nov 20, 2024
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@derickr @cmb69 @JdeBud