You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
All species agree (for some rare ones an alternative time series could be show that's slightly more informative, but still wouldn't be useful in practice), except for the following, which I'll take a look into:
tope shark
roughtail skate
pacific grenadier
vermillion (naming issue?)
Interestingly, Cabezon shows no time series in latest version, but did have one (and a map) for Anderson et al. (2019) [original gfsynopsis]. But that was because there was one Cabezon caught in 2018, but in a non-standard station off WCHG (and such stations are now excluded from the time series). That's the only one ever caught in the IPHC survey.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Doing a manual check between the latest version (gfsynopsis-sr-2022-02-04.pdf) and the gfiphc vignette http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/pbs-assess/gfiphc/blob/master/vignettes/data_for_all_species.html
All species agree (for some rare ones an alternative time series could be show that's slightly more informative, but still wouldn't be useful in practice), except for the following, which I'll take a look into:
Interestingly, Cabezon shows no time series in latest version, but did have one (and a map) for Anderson et al. (2019) [original gfsynopsis]. But that was because there was one Cabezon caught in 2018, but in a non-standard station off WCHG (and such stations are now excluded from the time series). That's the only one ever caught in the IPHC survey.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: