Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Briefly look into these species - gfsynopsis IPHC time series differ slightly from gfiphc vignette #141

Open
4 tasks
andrew-edwards opened this issue Mar 5, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@andrew-edwards
Copy link
Member

Doing a manual check between the latest version (gfsynopsis-sr-2022-02-04.pdf) and the gfiphc vignette http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/pbs-assess/gfiphc/blob/master/vignettes/data_for_all_species.html

All species agree (for some rare ones an alternative time series could be show that's slightly more informative, but still wouldn't be useful in practice), except for the following, which I'll take a look into:

  • tope shark
  • roughtail skate
  • pacific grenadier
  • vermillion (naming issue?)

Interestingly, Cabezon shows no time series in latest version, but did have one (and a map) for Anderson et al. (2019) [original gfsynopsis]. But that was because there was one Cabezon caught in 2018, but in a non-standard station off WCHG (and such stations are now excluded from the time series). That's the only one ever caught in the IPHC survey.

@andrew-edwards andrew-edwards self-assigned this Mar 5, 2022
@andrew-edwards
Copy link
Member Author

I'll try and figure this out but likely won't have time. We can still submit, but leave this open and I'll look into it some time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant