Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Sequence overloads and argument order #93

Open
jnape opened this issue Jul 13, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Sequence overloads and argument order #93

jnape opened this issue Jul 13, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees
@7h3kk1d
Labels
enhancement experimental

Comments

@jnape
Copy link
Member

jnape commented Jul 13, 2020

Determine if swapping the order of the arguments in sequence buys any better ergonomics due to currying, or if it's a pyrrhic victory due to the current overloading strategy (sequence(IO::io) would be ambiguous, for instance, about what the second argument type would be).
@7h3kk1d
Copy link
Member

7h3kk1d commented Jul 13, 2020

I'll take a look

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@7h3kk1d 7h3kk1d

Labels
enhancement experimental
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jnape @7h3kk1d