Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

how it compares to alternatives? #5

Open
ivanbalashov239 opened this issue Oct 13, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

how it compares to alternatives? #5

ivanbalashov239 opened this issue Oct 13, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@ivanbalashov239
Copy link

bcachefs, btrfs and etc

@donporter
Copy link
Member

Hi @seniorivn , can you clarify what aspect you are interested in? Our papers measure performance compared to several major file systems (ext4, btrfs, zfs, etc.). Most recently here:

http://www.cs.unc.edu/~porter/pubs/fast18-final129.pdf

I'd be happy to try to answer other questions you have.

@ivanbalashov239
Copy link
Author

@donporter
would be nice to see all of it in a nice user friendly way as just a few graphics on one web page or something.

But looks really, good, the comparison to the bcachefs would be even better. It's the most promising nextgen fs as for now, if your goal is mass adoption, you gonna have to beat it in all the aspects including reliability, performance, features, and kernel support.

Good luck on this path!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants