TexStudio .app file has unfriendly name in ARM machines

[mateusfccp]

Output of brew config

mateusfccp@mateusfccp ~> brew config
HOMEBREW_VERSION: 4.3.5
ORIGIN: https://github.com/Homebrew/brew
HEAD: 3f08c75e7b950d4340dab462f3e7f77e8093fa2b
Last commit: 2 days ago
Core tap JSON: 12 Jun 18:28 UTC
Core cask tap JSON: 12 Jun 18:28 UTC
HOMEBREW_PREFIX: /opt/homebrew
HOMEBREW_CASK_OPTS: []
HOMEBREW_MAKE_JOBS: 11
Homebrew Ruby: 3.3.2 => /opt/homebrew/Library/Homebrew/vendor/portable-ruby/3.3.2/bin/ruby
CPU: 11-core 64-bit arm_lobos
Clang: 15.0.0 build 1500
Git: 2.45.2 => /opt/homebrew/bin/git
Curl: 8.6.0 => /usr/bin/curl
macOS: 14.5-arm64
CLT: 15.3.0.0.1.1708646388
Xcode: 15.4
Rosetta 2: false

Output of brew doctor

mateusfccp@mateusfccp ~> brew doctor
Your system is ready to brew.

Description of issue

After installing TexStudio through the command brew install texstudio', the .appfile has the nametexstudio-4.8.0-osx-m1.app`.

I had a MacBook Pro 2019 Intel where this issue didn't happen and the .app file was named TexStudio.app.

Recently, I bought a M3 Pro, and after installing TexStudio, this unfriendly name was used instead.

I tried to rename the .app file manually, and it worked flawlessly until I had to update it through brew update. In this case, brew searches for the original file name, and as it doesn't find, it throws an error.

Relevant casks

texstudio (https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-cask/blob/619457413fc2155a8a4fd89a04338ee255a291d6/Casks/t/texstudio.rb)

[p-linnane]

This is how upstream names the binary. You'll need to open an issue with them and convince them to start distributing it under a different name.

[mateusfccp]

I though maybe Homebrew could have a way of renaming it and dealing with the renamed file?

[daeho-ro]

You may open a PR to add the app target with limited cases, https://docs.brew.sh/Cask-Cookbook#stanza-app.
Btw, I don't know what happen after the app is renamed.
When the previously installed users tried to update the application, then it could be failed.

[mateusfccp]

Maybe it would fall in this "aesthetic reasons"?