You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Usecase: I am looking only for landscapes when it comes to wallpapers on my desktop.
But looking for Shower curtains I would filter on portraits.
Assuming images consist of X and Y;
X < Y (absolute portrait)
Y > X (absolute landscape)
Y == X (Absolute square)
X < aY (a=0-0.999 relative portrait)
Y < aX (a=0-0.999 relative landscape)
X >= aY && Y >= aX (relative square)
what would be factor a?
lets assume aspect ratioś should also be provided (as filter) , I would assume aspect ratios wont exceed 1 digit (34/179th, anyone?). meaning 9/10 is not correct, but 8/9 would be.
the most sqaared aspect ratio then would be 5/9 or 4/9
the result is a difference of 5.55% from 50%.
I think this is a nice margin for errors.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Usecase: I am looking only for landscapes when it comes to wallpapers on my desktop.
But looking for Shower curtains I would filter on portraits.
Assuming images consist of X and Y;
X < Y (absolute portrait)
Y > X (absolute landscape)
Y == X (Absolute square)
X < aY (a=0-0.999 relative portrait)
Y < aX (a=0-0.999 relative landscape)
X >= aY && Y >= aX (relative square)
what would be factor a?
lets assume aspect ratioś should also be provided (as filter) , I would assume aspect ratios wont exceed 1 digit (34/179th, anyone?). meaning 9/10 is not correct, but 8/9 would be.
the most sqaared aspect ratio then would be 5/9 or 4/9
the result is a difference of 5.55% from 50%.
I think this is a nice margin for errors.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: