From c55226bcba5d746847b2108db0640ae542d361d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Carl Cervone <42869436+ccerv1@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 23:04:07 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] fix: truncate blog (#1730) --- .../blog/2024-06-29-impact-metrics-rf4-deep-dive/index.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/apps/docs/blog/2024-06-29-impact-metrics-rf4-deep-dive/index.md b/apps/docs/blog/2024-06-29-impact-metrics-rf4-deep-dive/index.md index 87268b6b4..086969801 100644 --- a/apps/docs/blog/2024-06-29-impact-metrics-rf4-deep-dive/index.md +++ b/apps/docs/blog/2024-06-29-impact-metrics-rf4-deep-dive/index.md @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ As discussed in our companion post, [Impact Metrics for Optimism Retro Funding 4 This post is a deeper dive on the work we did at Open Source Observer to help organize data about projects and prepare Optimism badgeholders for voting. + + ## Where the metrics come from We built a first-of-its-kind data pipeline for the Superchain: not only the data but also all source code, query logic, and underlying infrastructure is publicly available for use. We aren’t aware of any other fully open data pipelines of this size or complexity built this way. @@ -114,8 +116,6 @@ We're excited to see how this type of model evolves and is extended for future u ## Developing the impact metrics -### Principles - The following design principles guide the development and evolution of [impact metrics](https://docs.opensource.observer/docs/how-oso-works/impact-metrics/#principles): - Verifiability: Metrics should be based on public data that can be independently verified. They should not rely on proprietary data sources or private APIs.