[REVIEW]: pathways: life cycle assessment of energy transition scenarios

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @romainsacchi (Romain Sacchi)
Repository: https://github.com/polca/pathways
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: 0.0.1
Editor: @fraukewiese
Reviewers: @kcerva, @marc-vdm
Archive: Pending

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a454a9fc23453212416645423ab487a8"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a454a9fc23453212416645423ab487a8/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a454a9fc23453212416645423ab487a8/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a454a9fc23453212416645423ab487a8)

Reviewers and authors:

Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)

Reviewer instructions & questions

@kcerva & @marc-vdm, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review.
First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:

@editorialbot generate my checklist

The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @fraukewiese know.

✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨

Checklists

@kcerva, please create your checklist typing: @editorialbot generate my checklist

@marc-vdm, please create your checklist typing: @editorialbot generate my checklist

[editorialbot]

Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112311 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.00236 is OK
- 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 is OK
- 10.1007/s11367-021-01954-6 is OK
- 10.1111/jiec.12825 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118614 is OK
- 10.1038/s41560-017-0032-9 is OK
- 10.1088/1748-9326/aa914d is OK
- 10.1021/acs.est.5b01558 is OK
- 10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8 is OK
- 10.1016/j.spc.2018.07.001 is OK
- 10.18174/sesmo.18155 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.00097 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- None

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.04.015 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=2.18 s (33.0 files/s, 46160.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAML                            16             45             45          86023
Python                          22            765            774           2991
JSON                             2              0              0           1861
Jupyter Notebook                12              0           6262           1308
Markdown                         2            111              0            276
TeX                              1             13              0            165
CSV                             14              0              0            114
Bourne Shell                     2              2             20             10
INI                              1              0              0              4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            72            936           7101          92752
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   242	romainsacchi
    32	alvarojhahn

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1122

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[fraukewiese]

@romainsacchi : Could you check the invalid DOI (see above)?

[romainsacchi]

@fraukewiese Done!