Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

List and table: Scroll instead of pagination #396

Open
SaschaValentin opened this issue Jul 19, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

List and table: Scroll instead of pagination #396

SaschaValentin opened this issue Jul 19, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@SaschaValentin
Copy link

First of all: Really big congratulations for Openblocks! This seems to be the most promising one of all the low-code open source tools I´ve tried the last months (Appsmith, Tooljet, Illa, Budibase).

But there are one or two little missing functions that would really make it the perfect tool. So I hope there is a way to realize my suggestions maybe through some workaround or something like this.

  1. I really miss an option on list/table component to switch between pagination and infinite scroll. Especially when using an app on a phone pagination seems to be not a good choice.
  2. It would be very nice to conditionally show different hidden containers in case of click of a button or another event. Illa Builder offers a good example for this. There are different views for a container.

Hope someone could help me with this.
Thanks.

@FalkWolsky
Copy link

As the Openblocks Team left the whole project, it is not continued as Openblocks.
However, a small team of enthusiasts did decide to not let it die and continued the development.
Please find Lowcoder https://github.com/lowcoder-org/lowcoder as the continuation.

And as your request has a truly good suggestion, I kindly ask you to write us an issue at the new repository.

Between: Conditionally show different hidden containers - is without problems possible since you can bind the attribute "hidden" to a temporary state for example or to a javascript function...

@SaschaValentin
Copy link
Author

Dear Falk,

thanks for your reply and the good suggestion for the second question.

I think it´s a good thing you have taken over the further development of Openblocks because it was a really promising alternative to Appsmith and Tooljet and it seemed to be really more powerful.

And as you advised I will post an issue.

Thanks again

Sascha

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants