You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear @brandoncorbin and @donalmacanri, could you please clarify whether there are any plans for continuing the community development of Nomie in this repo versus encouraging forks (such as dailynomie)?
I fully understand you are probably no longer interested, but given Ronald's (@RdeLange) wonderful work on his fork, it would be helpful to either state "no further development, have a fork if needed" clearly here (and archive the repo?), or maybe have Ronald added as a maintainer (looking at the commit and issue history here I see it was maybe considered in the past?), so the he could merge his work back.
The reason I'm asking is that it's unclear to me which repo has a better future potential and as a prospective user and potentially a contributor, I'd like to pick "the right one". Some posts on Reddit also indicate confusion about the current split, so I think some clarity would benefit the community at large.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear @brandoncorbin and @donalmacanri, could you please clarify whether there are any plans for continuing the community development of Nomie in this repo versus encouraging forks (such as dailynomie)?
I fully understand you are probably no longer interested, but given Ronald's (@RdeLange) wonderful work on his fork, it would be helpful to either state "no further development, have a fork if needed" clearly here (and archive the repo?), or maybe have Ronald added as a maintainer (looking at the commit and issue history here I see it was maybe considered in the past?), so the he could merge his work back.
The reason I'm asking is that it's unclear to me which repo has a better future potential and as a prospective user and potentially a contributor, I'd like to pick "the right one". Some posts on Reddit also indicate confusion about the current split, so I think some clarity would benefit the community at large.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: