Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial data pull for Williamson county #74

Open
emilyrbartha opened this issue Sep 5, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Initial data pull for Williamson county #74

emilyrbartha opened this issue Sep 5, 2022 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@emilyrbartha
Copy link
Contributor

We want to be able to compare Williamson and Hayes county data formatting in order to determine the level of complexity we need to standardize / clean the data going forward. Format should be as similar as possible to Hayes County data.

@newswim newswim transferred this issue from open-austin/indigent-defense-stats May 25, 2023
@lianilychee
Copy link
Member

Validate priority with Josh and Nick.

@normaljosh normaljosh assigned nicolassaw and unassigned derac May 12, 2024
@nicolassaw nicolassaw transferred this issue from open-austin/azure-indigent-defense Jun 15, 2024
@nicolassaw nicolassaw added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 15, 2024
@nicolassaw nicolassaw removed their assignment Jun 15, 2024
@tpadmanabhan
Copy link

@jrex003 Do you have an update on this ticket?

@jrex003
Copy link
Contributor

jrex003 commented Jul 25, 2024

The current scraper does not work with Williamson county. We will need to figure out why and make adjustments.

However, I tried Taylor county and was able to get the scraper and parser working for it. The data formatting of Taylor vs Hays looks about the same.

@nicolassaw nicolassaw moved this from 🔖 To-do to 🏗 In progress in Product - Indigent Defense Stats Jul 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: 🏗 In progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants