You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At the moment, type_guess takes a types optional argument that is a list of type classes for data to be checked against.
I think the code would be more flexible if instead it took instances of type objects. Then users could modify the classes a little more easily. e.g. one could change the defaults of BoolType, which I find matching way too many things as is, especially on a sample of the file.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
At the moment, type_guess takes a types optional argument that is a list of type classes for data to be checked against.
I think the code would be more flexible if instead it took instances of type objects. Then users could modify the classes a little more easily. e.g. one could change the defaults of BoolType, which I find matching way too many things as is, especially on a sample of the file.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: