You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
from the 2023-09 Member Meeting Important Things discussion
OGC Rainbow (registered components) include those elements that we create; past SWG delivered components (e.g., definitions, requirements) governed by current policy. What about building blocks and their different types. Patterns of implementation could be registered as a resource and it would depend on the building blocks; mutiple registers for different levels of maturity
the general rule of thumb is that everything defined in a Standard becomes valid and can thus be registered
to be clear, the blocks themselves are governed by the owning SWG; the registered representations and how thay appear in Rainbow needs governance
we need an understanding of the definition of a building block. The origin was that the building blocks were pieces of Standards that could be sued without using the whole Standard
the mechanics of describing a building block need to be defined and we need governance of deciding which building blocks get registered and promoted for use
do not understand why we need to cherry pick given that our SWGs create building blocks and define them and we register them
there are other things that are developed in experimentation or use that function as building blocks and those need governance
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: