Document Sapphire and Remix

[matevz]

See what is needed for Remix to work seamlessly with Sapphire. Currently, it only works via "universal" metamask connector. A section on this was written years ago for Emerald. Revamp it for Sapphire and move it out of Emerald into a separate chapter under https://docs.oasis.io/dapp/tools/ ➝ Remix.

OFC you won't be able to debug in Remix much against Sapphire because it won't reveal confidential information.

Don't forget to mention the transactions and queries are unencrypted and unsigned.

Don't forget to pinpoint solc version up to 0.8.24 (see rust-ethereum/evm#277).

Also consider, if the Explorer➝Sourcify➝Remix flow is feasible to interact with a smart contract and worth describing it in this chapter how a (non-tech) user could communicate with the smart contract, e.g. if the maintainer decides to shut down the dApp frontend and the user is stuck with the contract and wants to withdraw his assets back. FYI @lukaw3d built a simpler alternative https://abi-playground.oasis.io/ for this.

[lukaw3d]

Maybe we can edit remix to allow sapphire in walletconnect

[lukaw3d]

https://github.com/ethereum/remix-project/blob/7211c686f4fd45687858d67fe5a70ce787d5e56e/apps/remix-dapp/src/utils/walletConnect.ts#L34 -> https://github.com/ethereum/remix-project/blob/7211c686f4fd45687858d67fe5a70ce787d5e56e/apps/remix-dapp/src/utils/constants.ts#L23-L45

https://github.com/ethereum/remix-project/blob/7211c686f4fd45687858d67fe5a70ce787d5e56e/apps/walletconnect/src/services/WalletConnectRemixClient.ts#L45 -> https://github.com/ethereum/remix-project/blob/7211c686f4fd45687858d67fe5a70ce787d5e56e/apps/walletconnect/src/utils/chains.ts#L1

[lukaw3d]

Reproducing an already verified contract annoyances:
https://explorer.oasis.io/mainnet/sapphire/address/0x8Bc2B030b299964eEfb5e1e0b36991352E56D2D3

• Open in Sourcify
• View in Remix
• https://remix.ethereum.org/?#activate=sourcify&call=sourcify//fetchAndSave//0x8Bc2B030b299964eEfb5e1e0b36991352E56D2D3//23294
• UI shows Solidity Compiler: 0.8.26 (probably kept selection from before)
  even though cloned metadata.json specified "version": "0.8.16+commit.07a7930e"
• Open WrappedROSE at path verified-sources/0x8Bc2B030b299964eEfb5e1e0b36991352E56D2D3/sources/contracts/WrappedROSE.sol
• Click compile. The resulting bytecode is different!
• WrappedROSE imports @openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol, and verified correct version of this dependency was cloned into verified-sources/0x8Bc2B030b299964eEfb5e1e0b36991352E56D2D3/sources/@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol
  file starts with

  // OpenZeppelin Contracts (last updated v4.7.0) (token/ERC20/ERC20.sol)

• But Remix automatically downloaded latest dependency into .deps/npm/@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol

  // OpenZeppelin Contracts (last updated v5.0.0) (token/ERC20/ERC20.sol)
  and compiled using this instead

• To reproduce the original bytecode, manually switch compiler version 0.8.16. Adjust advanced config to match metadata.json "optimizer": { "enabled": true, "runs": 0 }
• Remix now marks modern ERC20.sol as incompatible with compiler. Delete .deps/npm/@openzeppelin/contracts and move verified-sources/0x8Bc2B030b299964eEfb5e1e0b36991352E56D2D3/sources/@openzeppelin/contracts there.
• Recompile
• still "The deployed and recompiled bytecode don't match."

🤷

[rube-de]

Maybe we can edit remix to allow sapphire in walletconnect

IMHO that's low prio. I never noticed that's possible before 😅 and can't remember a tutorial that used WalletConnect in Remix. I could see to use it to deploy via ledger if you want to do it directly with Ledger live, but you could also deploy with Ledger via MetaMask.

[rube-de]

Reproducing an already verified contract annoyances: https://explorer.oasis.io/mainnet/sapphire/address/0x8Bc2B030b299964eEfb5e1e0b36991352E56D2D3

• Open in Sourcify
• View in Remix
• https://remix.ethereum.org/?#activate=sourcify&call=sourcify//fetchAndSave//0x8Bc2B030b299964eEfb5e1e0b36991352E56D2D3//23294

Open in Remix from sourcify just opens the default workspace in Remix

opened an issue on their side ethereum/sourcify#1730

[rube-de]

I think ABI Playground should be separate chapter
opened an issue for this #1012