Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
A bit more detail here would be helpful. Can you describe the access pattern you are after in more detail? Are you polling for changes? What is driving the need to query by run id more specifically? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
We are currently in the process of developing a solution that involves utilizing APIs. However, we have encountered an issue with the "runs.json" API, specifically regarding the inability to effectively filter using the "ID" parameter, as it returns an empty result.
This limitation prevents us from retrieving the status of a specific recipient, which is a crucial requirement. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be an alternative solution to address this problem. Consequently, we are left with the only option of fetching the entire dataset for flow runs, disregarding the parameters of date and ID. This approach will have a performance impact, especially if the flow has been sent to a large number of recipients over a significant time period, as the dataset retrieved from the API will contain all the results of the flow.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions