-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dummy Names for Functions and Links clashes nrLint Check #30
Comments
Yes it does - it identifies the nodes that have a blank name which is all they say they do.
To be clear - as I said on the forum - having a name of I fully agree it would be better for the user to set meaningful names - but the purpose of the generated default name is to help those users who don't rename things. The resolution for this issue will be either:
|
Thank you. :-)
I personally don't mind as long as we get that function. |
Apart from that. :-) Any idea when the new version of nrLint will be published? |
Current Behavior
As discussed in https://discourse.nodered.org/t/node-red-3-0-0-beta-2-released/62698/28, so that this doesn't get missed. Also see node-red/node-red#3618.
nrLint rules 'no-unnamed-functions' and 'no-unnamed-links' do not work with NR 3.0 automatic node naming.
Even if nodes now get dummy names, these are still considered to be unnamed, because "function 1" is as meaningless as "function".
Expected Behavior
No response
Steps To Reproduce
No response
Example flow
No response
Environment
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: