Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature]: consider adding more stock-recruit functions #614

Open
iantaylor-NOAA opened this issue Aug 7, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

[Feature]: consider adding more stock-recruit functions #614

iantaylor-NOAA opened this issue Aug 7, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
wishlist request new feature; bigger than revision; OK to remove after adding to Milestone
Milestone

Comments

@iantaylor-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the solution you would like.

Recent messages have suggested additional stock-recruit functions be considered (in addition to the 9 options currently in SS3 listed at https://nmfs-ost.github.io/ss3-doc/SS330_User_Manual_release.html#spawner-recruitment), including

Considering the amount of work that @Rick-Methot-NOAA has put into adding the a/b parameterization of the Beverton-Holt to SS3 (in progress at #442), it seems that adding a new option is not a trivial task (although some options may be more straightforward than others). Therefore, I'm not sure what level of benefit would need to be demonstrated to prioritize adding more options. Regardless, it seems valuable to document the suggestions via this issue.

Describe alternatives you have considered

continue with the existing options

Statistical validity, if applicable

No response

Describe if this is needed for a management application

No response

Additional context

No response

@Rick-Methot-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for organizing these into one place. I cannot see working on this until the fall, but it seems feasible to do.
The alpha, beta implementation was complicated only because it does not use R0, and because I needed to add a bunch of output to demonstrate that the R0, h approach is not necessarily broken if there is time-varying biology. I intend to finish that in order to get a release out by the end of August.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
wishlist request new feature; bigger than revision; OK to remove after adding to Milestone
Projects
Status: No status
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants