You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For a Nervos DAO withdrawing cell, the since field in the cell input should reflect the Nervos DAO cell’s lock period requirement, which is 180 epoches. For example, if one deposits into Nervos DAO at epoch 5, he/she can only expect to withdraw Nervos DAO at epoch 185, 365, 545, etc.
In the RFC23,it said that if deposit at epoch 5, we only can withdraw at 5+180n epoch. But it may make ppl misunderstand that even though they apply the first phase withdraw at 100 epoch,they are also could withdraw their asset only at 185+180n epoch. And when they want to execute the second phase withdraw at 187 epoch, they still need to wait to 365 epoch.
How about using "after" to replace "at"?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the RFC23,it said that if deposit at epoch 5, we only can withdraw at 5+180n epoch. But it may make ppl misunderstand that even though they apply the first phase withdraw at 100 epoch,they are also could withdraw their asset only at 185+180n epoch. And when they want to execute the second phase withdraw at 187 epoch, they still need to wait to 365 epoch.
How about using "after" to replace "at"?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: