Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should native contracts be destroyable? #3363

Open
AnnaShaleva opened this issue Jun 27, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Should native contracts be destroyable? #3363

AnnaShaleva opened this issue Jun 27, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
discussion Initial issue state - proposed but not yet accepted

Comments

@AnnaShaleva
Copy link
Member

Summary or problem description
The last part of #3210 that requires additional discussion. It's proposed to add destroy mechanism to native contracts so that native contracts management become very similar to the ordinary contracts. In future we may need native contracts to be destroyable, for example to replace one native contract with another new one.

The question is: should we support this functionality?

Where in the software does this update applies to?

  • Ledger
@AnnaShaleva AnnaShaleva added the discussion Initial issue state - proposed but not yet accepted label Jun 27, 2024
@shargon
Copy link
Member

shargon commented Jun 27, 2024

I think that is not required, we can make it possible in a future when it's needed

@vncoelho
Copy link
Member

I think that it is an important requirement, we can make it possible in a future when it's needed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion Initial issue state - proposed but not yet accepted
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants