Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

size limit for entries json string #216

Open
ulrichard opened this issue Jan 19, 2015 · 5 comments
Open

size limit for entries json string #216

ulrichard opened this issue Jan 19, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@ulrichard
Copy link

There seems to be a 512 char limit on the json string.
Is there any possibility I could use more chars for my id entry?

@JeremyRand
Copy link
Member

Hi,

The limit is actually 520 bytes. However, you can get more by using the "import" field. This is not particularly well documented at the moment, though.

@ulrichard
Copy link
Author

I couldn't find any documentation, and what I tried doesn't seem to work :

d/ulrichard stopped resolving on opennic dns servers after I introduced the include.

id/ulrichard doesn't retrieve the address in PyBitmessage, I have to use idd/ulrichard_bitmessage explicitly.

Are the includes resolved by the namecoin daemon or the querying application such as nmcontrol, bitmessage ...?

@JeremyRand
Copy link
Member

@ulrichard It's handled by NMControl. I'm actually not sure if we currently implement multiple imports in a single name (I see you're using a list). The import code is going to be refactored, so we'll make sure lists work properly when we do that.

@ulrichard
Copy link
Author

Wouldn't it be better if it was expanded by namecoind?
That way it would directly work for other applications as well. For example BitMessage.

@JeremyRand
Copy link
Member

@ulrichard The intention is for applications such as Bitmessage to read the blockchain using NMControl rather than directly querying namecoind. I believe Bitmessage supports reading from NMControl, no?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants