You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For a sub-boundary calculation, a full grain-reconstruction is (in theory at least) unnecessary if large-angle grain-boundaries have already been reconstructed. It would make sense to create a subroutine for sub-grain boundary calculations not to have to pay this overhead, when studying effect of changing sub-grainboundary treshold angles.
E.g. grains.innerBoundary = calcSubBoundary(grains/ebsd, threshold);
Since vertices and edges (V,F) are already saved in the grain2d object (right?) The incidence matrices can be re-created and the sub-boundary can be re-calculated without paying price of voronoi tesselation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For a sub-boundary calculation, a full grain-reconstruction is (in theory at least) unnecessary if large-angle grain-boundaries have already been reconstructed. It would make sense to create a subroutine for sub-grain boundary calculations not to have to pay this overhead, when studying effect of changing sub-grainboundary treshold angles.
E.g. grains.innerBoundary = calcSubBoundary(grains/ebsd, threshold);
Since vertices and edges (V,F) are already saved in the grain2d object (right?) The incidence matrices can be re-created and the sub-boundary can be re-calculated without paying price of voronoi tesselation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: