You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was looking into documentation regarding osd-overlay, and I find the formatted (or the absence of) indentation a bit misleading.
In the raw documentation (Link) it is clear that format can either be ass-events or none. While, in the formatted/mainstream documentation (Link), ass-events and none seem to be separate parameters in addition to format.
In addition to that, while overlay-add is explicitly defined with its parameters after the name of the command (<id> <x> <y> <file> <offset> <fmt> <w> <h> <stride> <dw> <dh>), osd-overlay doesn't have them, which maintain the confusion.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hello all,
I was looking into documentation regarding
osd-overlay
, and I find the formatted (or the absence of) indentation a bit misleading.In the raw documentation (Link) it is clear that
format
can either beass-events
ornone
. While, in the formatted/mainstream documentation (Link),ass-events
andnone
seem to be separate parameters in addition toformat
.In addition to that, while
overlay-add
is explicitly defined with its parameters after the name of the command (<id> <x> <y> <file> <offset> <fmt> <w> <h> <stride> <dw> <dh>
),osd-overlay
doesn't have them, which maintain the confusion.What do you guys think?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions