Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

new feature request: use more db instead one db in rocksdb #27

Open
xbsura opened this issue Jun 16, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

new feature request: use more db instead one db in rocksdb #27

xbsura opened this issue Jun 16, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@xbsura
Copy link

xbsura commented Jun 16, 2016

hello, all:

I am using rocksdb engine for mongodb, and it works good

But in order to make manage of nodes better, we need to more db in rocksdb layer

Now all mongodb dbs store in rocksdb as one db, so we can not migrate one db to another machine using copy file, if param directoryperdb can be supported in rocksdb engine, this will help us

can you think about support --directoryperdb param, which means different mongo db store in different dir
thanks

@mdcallag
Copy link
Contributor

mdcallag commented Jul 6, 2016

You just created two issues elsewhere. One would have been sufficient. Why
update this here? Your question isn't relevant to this issue.

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 8:27 PM, 474420502 [email protected] wrote:

rocksdb engine for mongodb , it has a bug the can't drop collection .
it don't delete data in disk . so bad !!!


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#27 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ABkKTQgcQnfN1bmpKojJk1MdX7WwfLZSks5qSyCagaJpZM4I3SdI
.

Mark Callaghan
[email protected]

@474420502
Copy link

@mdcallag sorry,i am a novice!

igorsol added a commit to igorsol/mongo-rocks that referenced this issue Dec 14, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants