Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wrong commands for intializing the Project #29

Open
AayushSaini101 opened this issue Feb 1, 2022 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #49
Open

Wrong commands for intializing the Project #29

AayushSaini101 opened this issue Feb 1, 2022 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #49
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working documentation Improvements or additions to documentation good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@AayushSaini101
Copy link

AayushSaini101 commented Feb 1, 2022

Describe the bug
In the project, all the commands are outdated or invalid. The path of the commands are not matching with the commands provided in the docs of the FLINT Reporting tool.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Go to Installing Services Docs of Reporting tool.

  2. See the first command
    new

  3. This is an invalid command because the initial project name is different also even most of the commands, are outdated or invalid
    new

  4. Valid command will be
    new

Operating Environment:

  • Ubuntu VM
@HarshCasper HarshCasper added bug Something isn't working documentation Improvements or additions to documentation good first issue Good for newcomers labels Feb 1, 2022
@asmijafar20
Copy link
Contributor

Superscript description is present in the README file of the scripts folder.

@AayushSaini101 AayushSaini101 linked a pull request Feb 18, 2022 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working documentation Improvements or additions to documentation good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants