Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating to be compatible with latest versions of Julia/JuMP/JuMPChance #3

Open
frederikgeth opened this issue Sep 21, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@frederikgeth
Copy link

Dear Miles,

Thank you for making the case study from your paper available! I'm trying to update the code to work against Julia 0.5.0, JuMPChance 0.3.0 and JuMP 0.14.1. I hope to work towards some computational tests of the CC/RCC approaches against scenario sampling to incorporate uncertainty.

I tried to fix al the depreciation warnings (Julia base / JuMP macro rename), but the problem seems infeasible now (all time steps). I tried both Gurobi and CPLEX, CC and RCC, both the reformulation and cut techniques (for CC).

Furthermore, It seems the meaning of the 'with_probability' keyword was switched (epsilon to 1-epsilon)?

I will send a pull request. In any case, thank you for your time and the contribution of this case study to the community! Tips/ hints welcome to solve this issue.

frederikgeth pushed a commit to frederikgeth/RobustCCOPFSupplement that referenced this issue Sep 21, 2016
See
Updating to be compatible with latest versions of Julia/JuMP/JuMPChance
mlubin#3

Updating for Julia 0.5.0, JuMPChance 0.3.0 and JuMP 0.14.1.

fix al the depreciation warnings
fix with_probability
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant