Trinity Graph Engine LocalStorage vs CloudStorage #379
TaviTruman
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I have been working with Graph Engine for 8 years now and I've learned many amazing aspects of the technology and continue to learn more the deeper I explore and dig into the code. When it comes to Trinity Graph Engine storage options, the two main choices are LocalStorage and CloudStorage. Choosing the right storage option is crucial for maximizing performance.
To make an informed decision, it's important to weigh the pros and cons of each option. Here, we'll compare Trinity Graph Engine LocalStorage and CloudStorage so you can determine which is best for your business.
Selecting the appropriate memory access model is crucial when utilizing Trinity Graph Engine. You must choose between LocalStorage and CloudStorage, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. If your graph is small enough to fit into a single machine's memory, LocalStorage offers faster performance and less inter-process communication. However, if you require scalability and your graph is larger, CloudStorage is the superior choice. Although CloudStorage may result in additional communication and coordination overhead, it allows for horizontal scaling as your graph expands. Your decision should be based on the size of your graph and your desired scalability.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions