From 914ecedbe8981587ae5c710bc43dc70b4a3aa5e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mdtanker Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:20:58 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] docs: add JOSS to citing page --- docs/citing.md | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/citing.md b/docs/citing.md index 08c95784..405069b7 100644 --- a/docs/citing.md +++ b/docs/citing.md @@ -4,11 +4,7 @@ This is research software made by scientists. Citations help us justify the effo If you used `PolarToolkit` in your research, please consider citing our paper: -```{warning} -Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS) paper still in review ... -``` +Tankersley, M. D., (2024). PolarToolkit: Python Tools for Convenient, Reproducible, and Open Polar Science. Journal of Open Source Software, 9(100), 6502, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06502 -This is an open-access publication. -The paper and the associated software review can be freely accessed at: [https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b3964f290fcd03c7706ef1973bcdf702](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b3964f290fcd03c7706ef1973bcdf702) If you would like to cite the specific version you used, which can improve reproducibility and let users know the state of the software at the time of your analysis, please use the version-specific citation and DOI (available from [Zenodo](https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.7059091)). \ No newline at end of file