-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rendering Footnotes #24
Comments
I agree, footnotes should be rendered correctly. I'll mark it as a future feature. Stay tuned! |
for future reference, a good starting point: markedjs/marked#1562 (comment) |
Works now! |
Doesn't seem to work in all cases: see https://noteshare.space/note/cl76nu7jj339101nuogo2pdp5#7BwC5OXgRneeFoalJM3GH6r-4iGTvVD7mVjW6w1HjtQ |
So sorry for my late response, I have been traveling. I am unfamiliar with this footnote syntax. Is it a way to define the footnote text inline? I was previously only familiar with this syntax: This is a paragraph^[1].
[1]: This is the footnote text, which will be rendered at the bottom of the page. |
Yes, it is an inline footnote. Like^[this is a footnote] which shows at the
foot of the rendered file with an ordinal and the text. See
https://help.obsidian.md/How+to/Format+your+notes
You can also use inline footnotes. ^[notice that the carat goes outside of
the brackets on this one.]
…On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 4:53 PM Maxime Cannoodt ***@***.***> wrote:
So sorry for my late response, I have been traveling.
I am unfamiliar with this footnote syntax. Is it a way to define the
footnote text inline? I was previously only familiar with this syntax:
This is a paragraph^[1].
[1]: This is the footnote text, which will be rendered at the bottom of the page.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#24 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAXFR3XNZE4KQCMY5H4SLLDV5OPTFANCNFSM57IF3PZA>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
I created a new issue to track this bug separately, see #31. |
Still doesn't seem to be working?
…On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 5:28 AM Maxime Cannoodt ***@***.***> wrote:
Closed #24 <#24> as
completed.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#24 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAXFR3U6KNJ7UTXATC3KXR3V5WQ43ANCNFSM57IF3PZA>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
As I said, I created a new issue to track the bug. I haven't fixed it just yet :) But don't worry, it's on my radar. You can subscribe to the new thread to follow progress: #31 |
Aha!
…On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 2:57 PM Maxime Cannoodt ***@***.***> wrote:
As I said, I created a new issue to track the bug. I haven't fixed it just
yet :) But don't worry, it's on my radar.
You can subscribe to the new thread to follow progress: #31
<#31>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#24 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAXFR3V53FSHNMEZK42LJVTV5YTRRANCNFSM57IF3PZA>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
It would be good if footnotes were rendered in the copied file.
In my use case, I write comments and place tags and other annotations in footnotes, but for sharing with others those would be better at the foot of the rendered file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: