feat: expose Engine Image CLIAPIVersion and ControllerAPIVersion #819
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Yi-Ya Chen <[email protected]>
WalkthroughThe changes introduce new functionality to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/routes/engineimage/detail/EngineImageInfo.js (1)
Line range hint
64-66: Enhance PropTypes validation for selectedEngineImageThe current PropTypes definition is too loose. Consider adding specific validation for all properties, including the newly added
cliAPIVersionandcontrollerAPIVersion.EngineImageInfo.propTypes = { - selectedEngineImage: PropTypes.object, + selectedEngineImage: PropTypes.shape({ + name: PropTypes.string.isRequired, + buildDate: PropTypes.string.isRequired, + state: PropTypes.string.isRequired, + incompatible: PropTypes.bool, + default: PropTypes.bool.isRequired, + cliAPIVersion: PropTypes.string, + controllerAPIVersion: PropTypes.string, + image: PropTypes.string.isRequired, + refCount: PropTypes.number.isRequired, + noRefSince: PropTypes.string, + nodeDeploymentMap: PropTypes.object, + }).isRequired, }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/routes/engineimage/detail/EngineImageInfo.js(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/routes/engineimage/detail/EngineImageInfo.js (2)
36-43: Implementation looks good and achieves PR objectives
The new fields are well-integrated into the existing component:
- Consistent styling and structure with other rows
- Logical placement in the UI
- Matches the requirements to expose CLIAPIVersion and ControllerAPIVersion
37-42: Verify API property name casing
Let's verify that the property names cliAPIVersion and controllerAPIVersion match exactly with the backend API response structure.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the API service code found in the output, particularly in the engine image service implementation, I can now generate the final response:
Property names match the API implementation
The property names cliAPIVersion and controllerAPIVersion are correctly used in the component as they match the API response structure. This is evidenced by the engine image API service implementation which handles the engine image data without any property transformation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for API-related files to verify property naming
rg -t js -t ts "engineImage.*Version"
Length of output: 39
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for these property names in the codebase
rg -t js -t ts "cliAPIVersion|controllerAPIVersion"
# Also search for any API response type definitions or interfaces
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
cli$_: $_
$$$
}'
# And check for any API-related files
fd -e ts -e js api
Length of output: 357
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for the engine image type definitions or API models
rg -t js -t ts "type.*EngineImage|interface.*EngineImage" -A 10
# Also check for any API response handling or data transformation
rg -t js -t ts "engineImage.*response|response.*engineImage" -i
# Look for any GraphQL schemas or type definitions
fd -e graphql . | xargs cat
Length of output: 2729
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the API services or client code
rg -t js -t ts "engineImage.*api|api.*engineImage" -i
# Look for any model or type definitions in the services directory
fd -e js -e ts . -t f | grep -i "service\|api\|client" | xargs cat
# Check for any swagger or OpenAPI definitions
fd -e yaml -e json . | grep -i "api\|swagger" | xargs cat
Length of output: 12694
| <div className={styles.row}> | ||
| <span className={styles.label}>CLIAPIVersion:</span> | ||
| <span>{selectedEngineImage.cliAPIVersion}</span> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div className={styles.row}> | ||
| <span className={styles.label}>ControllerAPIVersion:</span> | ||
| <span>{selectedEngineImage.controllerAPIVersion}</span> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add null safety for API version properties
The component directly renders cliAPIVersion and controllerAPIVersion without handling potential undefined or null values. Consider adding fallback values or conditional rendering.
<div className={styles.row}>
<span className={styles.label}>CLIAPIVersion:</span>
- <span>{selectedEngineImage.cliAPIVersion}</span>
+ <span>{selectedEngineImage.cliAPIVersion || 'N/A'}</span>
</div>
<div className={styles.row}>
<span className={styles.label}>ControllerAPIVersion:</span>
- <span>{selectedEngineImage.controllerAPIVersion}</span>
+ <span>{selectedEngineImage.controllerAPIVersion || 'N/A'}</span>
</div>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <div className={styles.row}> | |
| <span className={styles.label}>CLIAPIVersion:</span> | |
| <span>{selectedEngineImage.cliAPIVersion}</span> | |
| </div> | |
| <div className={styles.row}> | |
| <span className={styles.label}>ControllerAPIVersion:</span> | |
| <span>{selectedEngineImage.controllerAPIVersion}</span> | |
| </div> | |
| <div className={styles.row}> | |
| <span className={styles.label}>CLIAPIVersion:</span> | |
| <span>{selectedEngineImage.cliAPIVersion || 'N/A'}</span> | |
| </div> | |
| <div className={styles.row}> | |
| <span className={styles.label}>ControllerAPIVersion:</span> | |
| <span>{selectedEngineImage.controllerAPIVersion || 'N/A'}</span> | |
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@derekbit @c3y1huang
Currently, we don't handle empty data and leave the field blank.
Does it make sense to display N/A instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What's the purpose of the field?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's fine to add N/A as empty string or property undefeind fallback IMO.
| <div className={styles.row}> | ||
| <span className={styles.label}>ControllerAPIVersion:</span> | ||
| <span>{selectedEngineImage.controllerAPIVersion}</span> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The display sequence can be adjusted if needed.
What this PR does / why we need it
CLIAPIVersionandControllerAPIVersionon Engine Image Detail pageIssue
[IMPROVEMENT] Expose EngineImage CLIAPIVersion and ControllerAPIVersion
Test Result
The page should display
CLIAPIVersionandControllerAPIVersionAdditional documentation or context
N/A
Summary by CodeRabbit
EngineImageInfocomponent to displayCLIAPIVersionandControllerAPIVersionfor improved user visibility.