Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Include python 3.13 in testing and CI #188

Open
lmmentel opened this issue Oct 7, 2024 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #191
Open

Include python 3.13 in testing and CI #188

lmmentel opened this issue Oct 7, 2024 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #191
Assignees

Comments

@lmmentel
Copy link
Owner

lmmentel commented Oct 7, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Python 3.13.0 was recently released and it should be included in the test coverage.

Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

@ElricleNecro
Copy link

If I can add my 2 cents: unless there are changes that are known to break a package, we shouldn't add a version upper limit as this can have heavy impact on downstream package when not necessary.

(this is also in poetry guidelines)

@lmmentel
Copy link
Owner Author

Thanks, do you have any specific packages in mind here?

@ElricleNecro
Copy link

I was mainly thinking about the python version.

@lmmentel
Copy link
Owner Author

OK got it. Without the upper bound for python it is very hard to practically lock the dependencies (I'm using poetry for dependency management) since a lot of the package like numpy and pandas have defensive upper bounds since they might not be compatible with dev versions of python.

@lmmentel lmmentel self-assigned this Dec 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants