Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Decide if the leap second wrapper is the long-term API #60

Open
eteq opened this issue Dec 5, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Decide if the leap second wrapper is the long-term API #60

eteq opened this issue Dec 5, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@eteq
Copy link
Member

eteq commented Dec 5, 2019

As discussed in #49 (comment) and implemented in #58, there is now an API for updating the leap seconds. However, some compromises were made in this API, as it was basically done using Astropy as a "guinea pig". So this issue is a space to discuss practical drawbacks of the current API and would might be done to either improve or replace it.

There's not a clear end-point here, but tentatively I'd say if in 2 years time (i.e., the end of the LTS cycle of the Astropy version that this is used in), if we are happy with it we should declare the API "good". So by end of 2021 this can be closed if not before.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant