You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm getting a small number of nets flagged as open, and am wondering if I'm not understanding stacked vias correctly, or if there's a glitch in the evaluator (I'm using the v1 version). I have not checked them all, but it seems like it happens on nets where some of the pins are not on layer 0. Here's a small example from ariane133_51. The net is this:
I'm using the first access point on the first pin on layer 3, and ignoring the second access point. My router uses metal 2 for the horizontal connection, and metal 3 for the vertical, generating a routing (annotated) like this:
axi_req_o[10]
(
0 654 2 4 654 2 # Horizontal wiring, M2
4 653 3 4 654 3 # Vertical wiring, M3
0 654 2 0 654 3 # Via drops from first point down to horizontal M2
4 653 0 4 653 1 # Second point - via up to M1
4 653 1 4 653 2 # Second point - via up to M2
4 653 2 4 653 3 # Second point - via up to M3
4 654 2 4 654 3 # Connect two the wire segments
)
I think this should be connected -- but maybe I'm missing something?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm getting a small number of nets flagged as open, and am wondering if I'm not understanding stacked vias correctly, or if there's a glitch in the evaluator (I'm using the v1 version). I have not checked them all, but it seems like it happens on nets where some of the pins are not on layer 0. Here's a small example from ariane133_51. The net is this:
I'm using the first access point on the first pin on layer 3, and ignoring the second access point. My router uses metal 2 for the horizontal connection, and metal 3 for the vertical, generating a routing (annotated) like this:
I think this should be connected -- but maybe I'm missing something?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: