You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We see heavy blockiness in close-up to the surface, due to the limited resolution of our terrain map, and the fact no filtering is done over the material property.
Obviously, just plain filtering the material ID doesn't work. Averaging materials 5 and 10 doesn't make sense. Instead, we can gather all 4 material IDs, do all the lighting computations on them, and apply bilinear filtering to the result.
Performance-wise, it's not too fast. However, it's only going to be done once per pixel of the main frame rendering (not shadow map or anything else). And there is already some ray-tracing going on there, so it's not like this enhancement would make it much slower :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We see heavy blockiness in close-up to the surface, due to the limited resolution of our terrain map, and the fact no filtering is done over the material property.
Obviously, just plain filtering the material ID doesn't work. Averaging materials 5 and 10 doesn't make sense. Instead, we can gather all 4 material IDs, do all the lighting computations on them, and apply bilinear filtering to the result.
Performance-wise, it's not too fast. However, it's only going to be done once per pixel of the main frame rendering (not shadow map or anything else). And there is already some ray-tracing going on there, so it's not like this enhancement would make it much slower :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: