-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use an interface to construct Populator Pod Spec #171
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Use an interface to construct Populator Pod Spec #171
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: nahwneeth The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Welcome @nahwneeth! |
Hi @nahwneeth. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-csi member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
Adds an interface to provide the library user the ability to construct a pod spec tailored for their workload. In issue #170 I've tried to described how this can be used to provide trusted CA certificates to containers using cluster trust bundles irrespective of the variant of linux container used.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #170
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: