Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Improve coverage of anonymous traversals. #265

Open
krlawrence opened this issue Oct 6, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Improve coverage of anonymous traversals. #265

krlawrence opened this issue Oct 6, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
fix-in-second-edition improvements

Comments

@krlawrence
Copy link
Owner

Anonymous traversals are only mentioned five times in the fist edition and in at least one case not described quite accurately. They are described as not spawning from V or E which can be misleading and is also not quite accurate.

In general for the second edition the discussion of anonymous traversals should be expanded and improved.
spmallette added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 5, 2023
@spmallette
Coverage for anonymous traversals and anonymous traversal source
cef11f9 
The anonymous traversal source with() syntax is in 4.x now and is a bit more streamlined than what was there before. There may yet be some spots that were missed, but most should be covered. This also covers a lot of Graph API removal. #265 #259
@spmallette spmallette mentioned this issue Dec 5, 2023
Merged
spmallette added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 11, 2023
@spmallette
Coverage for anonymous traversals and anonymous traversal source
9e66233 
The anonymous traversal source with() syntax is in 4.x now and is a bit more streamlined than what was there before. There may yet be some spots that were missed, but most should be covered. This also covers a lot of Graph API removal. #265 #259
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Medium Priority in Planning Aug 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
fix-in-second-edition improvements
Projects
Planning
Status: Medium Priority
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@krlawrence