You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is it possible to cascade 2 of the same provider types, such as S3, where each uses a different configuration? For instance, the primary storage works with bucket A while the secondary works with bucket B. Bucket A should be the read-write bucket, while bucket B is read-only.
From the look of things this isn't currently possible because no facility is provided to enable per storage configuration. Everything must be handled within the top level configuration.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
You are correct. This isn’t currently possible, but it would be a great feature.
On Monday, November 11, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Jeremy Bopp wrote:
Is it possible to cascade 2 of the same provider types, such as S3, where each uses a different configuration? For instance, the primary storage works with bucket A while the secondary works with bucket B. Bucket A should be the read-write bucket, while bucket B is read-only.
From the look of things this isn't currently possible because no facility is provided to enable per storage configuration. Everything must be handled within the top level configuration.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (#1).
Is it possible to cascade 2 of the same provider types, such as S3, where each uses a different configuration? For instance, the primary storage works with bucket A while the secondary works with bucket B. Bucket A should be the read-write bucket, while bucket B is read-only.
From the look of things this isn't currently possible because no facility is provided to enable per storage configuration. Everything must be handled within the top level configuration.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: