-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 447
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Jfrog Platform: Artifactory Failing to determine database type on startup #1823
Comments
@Souheil-Yazji Could you please share the complete values.yaml file ? |
Hi, I'm facing the same issue as well with this helm chart deployment values,yaml
|
+1 to this |
I'm facing the same issue with mysql 8 in after upgrading from 2024-01-25T11:47:14.390Z [jfac ] [ERROR] [a2d28409b6c5518e] [.s.d.u.AccessJdbcHelperImpl:73] [Catalina-utility-2 ] - Could not initialize database:
org.flywaydb.core.api.FlywayException: Detected failed migration to version 7.82.0.1 (PermissionsV2DataMigration)
at org.flywaydb.core.internal.info.MigrationInfoImpl.validate(MigrationInfoImpl.java:218)
at org.flywaydb.core.internal.info.MigrationInfoServiceImpl.validate(MigrationInfoServiceImpl.java:327)
at org.flywaydb.core.internal.command.DbValidate$2.call(DbValidate.java:174)
at org.flywaydb.core.internal.command.DbValidate$2.call(DbValidate.java:164)
at org.flywaydb.core.internal.util.jdbc.TransactionTemplate.execute(TransactionTemplate.java:75)
at org.flywaydb.core.internal.command.DbValidate.validate(DbValidate.java:164)
at org.flywaydb.core.Flyway.doValidate(Flyway.java:1017)
at org.flywaydb.core.Flyway.access$100(Flyway.java:72)
at org.flywaydb.core.Flyway$1.execute(Flyway.java:934)
at org.flywaydb.core.Flyway$1.execute(Flyway.java:930)
at org.flywaydb.core.Flyway.execute(Flyway.java:1413)
at org.flywaydb.core.Flyway.migrate(Flyway.java:930)
at org.jfrog.storage.util.migration.MigrationUtil.initSingleTenantSchema(MigrationUtil.java:159)
at org.jfrog.storage.util.migration.MigrationUtil.initSchemas(MigrationUtil.java:98)
at org.jfrog.access.server.db.util.AccessJdbcHelperImpl.init(AccessJdbcHelperImpl.java:71)
at org.jfrog.access.server.db.util.AccessJdbcHelperImpl.<init>(AccessJdbcHelperImpl.java:56)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:77)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) |
I don't think this is an issue with the helm chart - I believe it's an issue with the Artifactory version. Was running Artifactory version Then I tried to run Artifactory version My helm chart version is |
Indeed it's an issue with Artifactory application 7.77 - More details and resolution can be found here. |
@gitta-jfrog we're seeing the exact same issue on 7.84.20 after upgrading from 7.84.11 and the link you posted above says absolutely nothing about the details and resolution. I even checked in archive.org - unless that info was removed before April 12 there's nothing about database type errors on that page. |
Hi @bewinsnw The link I shared is related to the issue with instances running on MySQL database as described "Detected failed migration to version 7.82.0.1 (PermissionsV2DataMigration)". It is not related to "Database connection check failed Could not determine database type" which might cause for several reasons, not necessarily failing Artifactory from start. If you are having support as part of your subscription - please open support ticket and our support engineers will work with you up to full resolution. if you are not having support - I'll ask you to open a new Github issue with all the details (version before, version after upgrade, database type and values yaml) and I'll try to assist as much as I can. Thanks |
@bewinsnw We're enterprise customers and are experiencing the same issue. I've submitted a support request and will keep you updated on what JFrog says. @gitta-jfrog it might be a good idea to reopen this issue. Is your solution just to wait? |
Restoring and restarting the migration helped resolve the issue. This solution is actually described in the link posted by @gitta-jfrog. I'm hosting on AWS RDS MySQL, and even my super admin didn't have the SYSTEM_VARIABLES_ADMIN privilege enabled. |
is it possible to enable more logging with a helm chart based installation to see what exactly goes wrong? |
We have run in to remarkably similar, but not identical, issues with artifactory v7.90.10 (plus a few other minor versions). While we are still grappling with finding an RCA one commonality we noted was the presence of dynatrace operators running on the same node. Anyone else have monitoring workloads on the same node? No idea how this would cause the symptoms described here but it's the only common denominator we can find so far. |
Is this a request for help?: No
Is this a BUG REPORT or FEATURE REQUEST? (choose one): BUG REPORT
Version of Helm and Kubernetes:
Helm: 3.7.1
k8s 1.25 (AKS)
Which chart:
Jfrog-platform: 10.15.1
Which product license (Enterprise/Pro/oss): Enterprise
JFrog support reference (if already raised with support team): - no support issue raised.
What happened:
On start up, we see the following:
2023-09-26T04:58:09.780Z [shell] [INFO ] [] [systemYamlHelper.sh:607 ] [main] - Resolved .shared.database.type (postgresql) from /opt/jfrog/artifactory/var/etc/system.yaml
then while installerCommon.sh is running:
Not sure if these two failures are related, but the database.type seems to be successfully parsed above AND the connection from the mission control service succeeds right after.
2023-09-26T04:58:21.319Z [jfmc ] [INFO ] [ ] [.MissionControlApplication:158] [Catalina-utility-3 ] - Connection to database successful
What you expected to happen:
No failure
RT successfully connects to the external pgdb
How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible):
Create a helm release with all defaults but add to the chart values
If using the jfrog-platform chart::
Anything else we need to know:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: